The tech startup sector is full of new ventures jostling for funding, and only a handful of them become successful. But at the more mature end of the tech sector, a few giant companies control the vast majority of online advertising. Google and Facebook have tremendous power to limit competition while they benefit from user data harvested from “free” use of their services, argues Luigi Zingales, the Robert C. McCormack Distinguished Service Professor of Entrepreneurship and Finance and director of Booth’s Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State. Zingales and Raghuram G. Rajan, the Katherine Dusak Miller Distinguished Service Professor of Finance, find that big tech firms stifle innovation when they buy up promising startups.
The Stigler Center’s Committee on Digital Platforms has studied the degree of market power digital platforms enjoy and the way this market power harms consumers. The tech giants have less incentive to innovate, maintain the quality of their services, or refrain from even more aggressive data-collection practices if their users don’t have alternative services to turn to. Limited competition in the market for online advertising could also drive up costs for advertisers, which could in turn result in higher prices for those companies’ customers. And as Zingales has argued, tech firms’ dominant position threatens to distort not only markets but the political system as well.
What can we do about it? One important step we could take, Zingales says, is to draw upon the regulatory playbook from the dawn of the telephone industry, in which networks were made to work together to allow their users to call each other. Such forced interoperability between digital platforms could help restore competition online.
Luigi Zingales: But you know, people say that data is the new oil. And Zuckerberg is the new Rockefeller. Now at the time of Rockefellerr, they used to say that he was more efficient. He was more efficient, but he controlled 95 percent of the refineries in the United States.
And he had deals that restricted the ability of shipping oil in a competitive way with the railways. So he was, effectively, abusing his market position, and I think that it was the right decision for the antitrust of the United States to go after Rockefeller and break up Standard Oil.
So if this was today, would you be in favor of breaking up Standard Oil, or not?
The independent and nonpartisan committee spent over a year studying in-depth how digital platforms such as Google and Facebook impact the economy and antitrust laws, data protection, the political system, and the news media industry.Stigler Committee on Digital Platforms: Final Report
Booth researchers are exploring what should drive corporate decisions in the 21st century.Companies Should Focus on Profits. Shouldn’t They?
Questioning Answers in the Classroom
The Chicago Approach to business education—Booth’s educational philosophy—will teach you how to turn any business challenge—no matter how small or large—into an opportunity. Learn how our transformative curriculum helps our students ask better questions and discover better answers. No matter which MBA program you pursue—Full-Time, Part-Time, or Executive—you get the same transformative academic experience, the same world-class faculty, the same influential network, the same dynamic community.
The Executive MBA Program is registered under the Hong Kong Education Bureau. Registration No.: 262427. It is a matter of discretion for individual employers to recognise any qualification to which this course may lead.