Does Restricting Choice Lead to Better Schools?
In Los Angeles, students and schools benefited from small pockets of competition.
Does Restricting Choice Lead to Better Schools?Glen Gyssler
If revenues are any barometer, state-run lotteries are among the most popular forms of entertainment in the United States. Such lotteries brought in more than $83 billion in the US in fiscal 2019, according to the North American Association of State and Provincial Lotteries—dwarfing, for example, the $11.4 billion North American moviegoers spent at the box office. Lotteries generate significant sums for public-sector priorities such as education and health care. But they are also a form of legalized gambling, which means they could do disproportionate harm to people with gambling addictions or few resources. So do state-run lotteries improve social welfare on balance? Chicago Booth’s Initiative on Global Markets put that question to its US Economic Experts Panel, and finds that a plurality of panelists are uncertain (meaning they believe that the evidence is ambiguous), with a significant minority on either end arguing for or against lotteries as a prosocial force.
Several panelists supplemented their answers with links to supporting research. Chicago Booth’s Anil K. Kashyap and Stanford’s Peter J. Klenow each referred to (different) papers by University of Maryland’s Melissa Schettini Kearney about the effects of legalized gambling and lotteries (the latter coauthored with Northwestern’s Jonathan Guryan). Darrell Duffie of Stanford pointed toward his own research on speculative trading to inform his opinion.
Robert Hall, Stanford
“I’m inclined to think that government should not exploit the public’s vulnerability to gambling, but I’m also aware of counter-arguments.”
Response: Uncertain
William Nordhaus, Yale
“Among the worst of social policies.”
Response: Strongly disagree
Robert Shimer, University of Chicago
“If there were no state-run lotteries, more private institutions would enable possibly biased consumers to gamble.”
Response: Agree
Richard H. Thaler, Chicago Booth
“States giving themselves a monopoly in this business is bad for sure, but if the alternative is prohibition, is that better?”
Response: Uncertain
In Los Angeles, students and schools benefited from small pockets of competition.
Does Restricting Choice Lead to Better Schools?The former governor of the Reserve Bank of India discusses the Fed’s role in the US economy and analyzes its response to the pandemic.
Who Does Raghuram Rajan Blame for Inflation?Booth’s Raghuram G. Rajan and Martin Wolf of the Financial Times discuss the pressures faced by democratic systems.
How Can We Restore Trust in Democracy?Your Privacy
We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice, which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.