Many recent tax-reform discussions have centered on how to get large US companies to bring home the $2.6 trillion they have stashed overseas. Research by Stanford’s Lisa De Simone and Joseph D. Piotroski and Chicago Booth’s Rimmy E. Tomy suggests that those discussions may already be having an effect, by prompting more companies to move money out of the United States.
In 2004, the US Congress lowered the tax rate companies would pay when bringing their overseas cash holdings back to the US, from 35 to 5.25 percent. As a result of this tax holiday, companies brought home $312 billion between November 2004 and December 2005.
Are special tax incentives for firms worth the costs for local governments?
What Economists Think about ‘Sweetheart’ Tax ArrangementsDuring the 2007–09 global financial recession, Congress stirred expectations that multinational corporations might get a second tax holiday. “The first notable discussion occurred with the introduction of the Responsibly Ending Authority to Purchase (REAP) Act of 2008, and commentary, debate and rumors of a second tax holiday ensued,” write the researchers. Six other bills were introduced in Congress through the end of 2011 that offered the possibility of a second tax holiday.
Using company-level data that both predate and coincide with these congressional discussions, the researchers examined cash-holding and tax-planning behavior of US multinationals, tracking the growth in cash holdings over the three-year period. They applied a model that used the characteristics of companies that chose to repatriate foreign cash during the 2004 tax holiday to determine the likelihood that companies would repatriate cash during the subsequent discussions.
The findings suggest companies strategically respond to anticipated tax breaks. The 594 companies most likely to repatriate cash accumulated between $376 billion and $488 billion in excess cash from 2008 to 2011, the researchers calculate. Because tax rates would presumably be low in a second tax holiday, companies most likely to benefit shifted more income offshore, to low-tax foreign areas, increasing the amount of cash available for tax-preferred repatriation. And stock prices around the first legislative event, the REAP Act of 2008, increased the most for companies most likely to benefit from the tax holiday.
Taken collectively, the results suggest that ballooning foreign cash balances are strongly related to an anticipated tax break, evidence that companies respond to future tax policy.
Research suggests the interaction between regulations helps explain market disruptions.
A Way to Explain, and Help Avoid, Shocks to the Treasury Market
A Q&A with Chicago Booth’s Constantine Yannelis on policies to address the student-loan crisis.
The Case for Pausing, Not Canceling, Student Debt
Ralph Nader joins the podcast to discuss ethically profitable business, the political disillusionment of the public, and the state of capitalism today.
Capitalisn’t: Ralph Nader’s CapitalismYour Privacy
We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice, which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.