In the world of academic journals, editors are the gatekeepers of their discipline, accepting only high-quality research papers that push the frontier of knowledge forward. But beyond furthering the field and maintaining a journal’s high standards, editors can use other criteria when choosing which papers to publish, including whether a paper’s findings can guide policy makers in forming policies that achieve better outcomes for society, argue Chicago Booth’s Alexander Frankel and University of Oxford’s Maximilian Kasy. For a paper to inform policy makers and prompt a change in policy, its findings must deviate substantially from prevailing beliefs on a particular policy. A paper that simply confirms existing policies doesn’t add much value and comes with an opportunity cost—if published, it can shift the public’s attention away from papers that deserve more attention. To learn more about this research, read “A way out of the replication crisis.”
Adapted from the researchers’ paper, “Which Findings Should Be Published?”
Illustration by Peter Arkle
Alexander Frankel and Maximilian Kasy, “Which Findings Should Be Published?” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, forthcoming.
The former governor of the Reserve Bank of India discusses the Fed’s role in the US economy and analyzes its response to the pandemic.
Who Does Raghuram Rajan Blame for Inflation?
Forty percent of commute time savings went back into jobs.
An Upside of WFH for Employers
Elections, as well as state-specific and national events, also cause levels to rise.
Local COVID Lockdowns Fed Economic Policy UncertaintyYour Privacy
We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice, which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.