The rise of remote work eases the challenge confronting monetary policy makers in their efforts to bring the inflation rate down to acceptable levels, according to a team of researchers that includes Chicago Booth’s Steven J. Davis.
Many workers like to work from home one or more days per week because it saves on the time and monetary costs of commuting. Work from home also offers more flexibility in time use and greater personal autonomy.
Employers can moderate wage-growth pressures by offering work-from-home privileges in lieu of bigger pay hikes. What’s more, it’s now practical in some jobs (e.g., software coder, IT specialist, and call-center worker) to offer positions that are mostly or entirely remote. That enables employers to reduce labor costs by hiring workers who live in places with lower prevailing wages. For both reasons, the rise of remote work can benefit employers by helping them restrain the growth in their labor costs.
How does this observation relate to inflation and monetary policy? The Consumer Price Index, which measures US consumer prices, rose 8.6 percent over the 12 months ending May 2022, a jump of several percentage points relative to previous years. Nominal wage growth failed to keep pace. Real average hourly earnings in the US private sector fell 3 percent over the 12-month period ending May 2022, after adjusting for CPI inflation. Since real hourly earnings rose by an average of 0.7 percentage points per year before the pandemic struck, the inflation surge drove a surprise loss in real wages of 3.7 percentage points.
Some economists argue that pressures for a catch-up in real wages stoke inflation, as workers demand more money to make up for the purchasing power they’ve lost. In effect, the surprise component of recent price inflation raises future wage inflation. Higher wage inflation, in turn, raises labor costs and thereby feeds into higher price inflation. Thus, a bigger wage-catchup effect implies the need for tighter monetary policy to bring the inflation rate down to a desired level, raising the likelihood of recession in the process.
In surveys fielded by the Atlanta Fed, business executives estimated that expansions in remote work have enabled them to moderate wage growth by about 2 percentage points over two years, more so in sectors with a larger share of jobs that can be performed remotely, because employees accept smaller pay hikes for the opportunity to work from home.
That’s a sound argument, but the wage catch-up effect on inflation is lessened if employers use the rise of remote work to moderate wage-growth pressures. Davis—along with Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology’s Jose Maria Barrero, Stanford’s Nicholas Bloom, and the Atlanta Fed’s Brent Meyer and Emil Mihaylov—developed evidence on the force of this wage-growth moderation effect. The researchers find that “the rise of remote work shrinks the real-wage catchup effect by an estimated 54 percent.”
To reach this assessment, they crafted new questions for the Survey of Business Uncertainty, which is conducted by the Atlanta Fed in partnership with Booth and Stanford. The researchers asked nearly 500 US business executives whether, over the past year, their companies expanded work-from-home and other remote-location opportunities “as a way to keep employees happy and to moderate wage-growth pressures.” Thirty-eight percent answered yes, while 41 percent said they would let employees work from home at least one day a week over the next year to restrain wage-growth pressures.
When the executives said their company expanded remote work to moderate wage growth over the past year, or would do so in the coming year, the researchers followed up with questions about how much moderation they saw or expected to see. Averaging over all companies in the sample, they find that the rise of remote work moderated wage growth by 0.9 percentage points over the past year and that the executives predict it will do so by an additional 1.1 percentage points over the coming year.
Over two years, that adds up to wage-growth moderation of 2 percentage points. The wage-growth moderation effect is greater in industries with more scope for remote work, such as finance, insurance, real estate, social services, and education. It is smaller in industries with less scope for remote work, such as retail, transportation, and hospitality. Because of increased employee satisfaction, expanded remote-work opportunities can also lower employee quit rates, reducing turnover costs.
Jose Maria Barrero, Nicholas Bloom, Steven J. Davis, Brent H. Meyer, and Emil Mihaylov, “The Shift to Remote Work Lessens Wage-Growth Pressures,” Working paper, July 2022.
Turkey’s experience suggests ‘place-based policies’ can have unintended effects.
Does Targeting Aid Help Poorer Regions?
Government-supported re-skilling can be good for workers and taxpayers.
Line of Inquiry: Anders Humlum on How to Help More Injured Workers
Ideas abound for a simpler, more effective tax regime.
Is the Tax Code beyond Fixing?Your Privacy
We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice, which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.